In other words, the driver’s door in his EV should have opened if the physician had pulled the handle.
Awan’s Model S did not have these actuators on the front doors. If an electrical failure occurs, they demand a mechanical manual release. That did not happen in Jutha’s Model Y, because its doors work with electronic actuators. She told NBC6 that her husband would be still alive if the Model S door handles simply opened the car. We were unable to learn what was detected in his blood, or how much it was above the legal limits.įor Liliana Awan, determining who was responsible for the crash is not the question.
TOWERMADNESS 2 TESLA DOES NOT ATTACK AIR DRIVER
In its response to the lawsuit, Tesla argued that the driver was under the influence of alcohol or drugs because the toxicology results were above the legal limits. On October 10, 2019, his family sued Tesla because the autopsy concluded that he did not die due to the crash, but rather asphyxiated by the “inhalation of products of combustion.” Thermal injuries contributed to his death.Īlthough the speed limit there is 45 mph (72 kph), the police report stated that Awan’s Model S left the road at “a minimum of 79.60 mph” (128,1 kph). Witnesses tried to remove Awan from the EV but were not able to do so. The physician crashed his EV on February 24, 2019, while driving on Flamingo Road in Davie, Florida.
0 kommentar(er)
